Appeal Decision 229 - Certificate of Lawful
      Development.
    
        
            
                
                    This appeal decision summary and
                          assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited.  For more information, please go to  www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
                 
             | 
         
    
 
 
 
April 2011 - Code a00229 
  
Summary of Case (appeal
   dismissed):  
  
The property is a terrace
   house within a conservation area, and the application was for a proposed single storey rear extension. The main
   house is finished in pebbledash, and the proposed extension would be finished in white render.  
  
The key issue was whether the
   proposed extension would be contrary to Class A, part A.2(a), which states that “In the case of a dwellinghouse
   on article 1(5) land, development is not permitted by Class A if … it would consist of or include the cladding
   of any part of the exterior of the dwellinghouse with stone, artificial stone, pebble dash, render, timber,
   plastic or tiles”.  
  
The Inspector stated the
   following:  
  
“The appeal site is a
   terraced dwelling that is located within the Plumstead Common Conservation Area, and the application plans in
   this case indicate that the external elevations of the proposed new extension would be finished in white render.
   Render is one of the cladding materials whose use in conservation areas is precluded, in GPDO terms, by
   virtue of the paragraph A.2(a) exclusion. It was on this basis that the Council refused to issue a lawful
   development certificate.  
  
The exterior of the
   dwellinghouse is pebble-dashed. Any other external finish to the elevations of the proposed extension
   would be excluded from permitted development by virtue of GPDO paragraph A.3(a), which makes development
   permitted by Class A subject to a condition requiring the use of similar materials to those used in the
   construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse. Since pebble dash is also excluded in this case by
   virtue of paragraph A.2(a), it seems inevitable that express planning permission must be sought for the
   extension, by application to the Council.”  
  
Main
   Conclusions:  
  
·      
      In a
      conservation area (or
      other article 1(5) land), Class A, part A.2(a) not only prevents the cladding of
      the main house, but also prevents the cladding of
      any extension. [Relevant to: A.2(a)]. 
  
·      
      For
      a property in a conservation area
      (
      or other article 1(5) land)
      where the existing
      house is finished in cladding, the combination of Class A, part
      A.2(a) and Class A, part A.3(a) would prevent any
      extension. This is because the former limitation prevents the
      extension from being finished in cladding, whereas the latter condition prevents the extension from being
      finished in anything other than cladding. [Relevant to: “Materials”, A.2(a), A.3(a)]. 
  
Links to the “Appeal
   Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):  
  
·      
      Appeal Decision
      Notice: 
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00229-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
·      
      Council’s Decision
      Notice: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00229-Councils-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
  
  
 
   
  
Download documents and diagrams of
useful 
Permitted Development
information 
  
 
  
 |