| Appeal Decision 216 - Certificate of Lawful
      Development.
    
        
            | 
                    This appeal decision summary and
                          assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited.  For more information, please go to  www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
                 |  
   
 February 2011 - Code a00216   Summary of Case (appeal
   dismissed):    The property is a two-storey
   end-of-terrace house. The original design of this row of terraces is relatively unusual, and is best understood
   by viewing the property (e.g. via Google StreetView). In front of the two-storey main front wall, there is a
   projecting front porch (at one end of the front elevation), a projecting front canopy (covering the remaining
   width of the front elevation), and projecting ground floor front walls (enclosing the sides of the porch and
   canopy). The application was retrospective, and related to the erection of a front wall to infill this area so
   that it would become part of the ground floor lounge.    The key issue was whether the
   proposed extension would be contrary to Class A, part A.1(d), which states that “Development is not permitted by
   Class A if … the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse would extend beyond a wall which— (i) fronts a highway, and
   (ii) forms either the principal elevation or a side elevation of the original  dwellinghouse”.    The Inspector stated the
   following:    “The property is a two
   storey, two bedroom end terrace house with a pitched roof. On the front, a small area of flat roof extended over
   the main ground floor window and projected beyond the first floor elevation above. The application relates to a
   small ground floor extension that was erected underneath the flat roof canopy and adjacent to the front door.
   The extension infills the void and does not project beyond the walls to either side.    The front extension has
   been added to the principal elevation of the house, which, as a matter fact, fronts a highway. The addition
   extends beyond the original ground floor wall and the upper wall forming the principal elevation. In my view
   this is the decisive point and therefore the extension is specifically excluded by the terms of A.1(d).
   Accordingly the development is not permitted under the provisions of Class A of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the
   GPDO. It would need to gain planning permission through an express application to the local planning authority.
   My understanding is that at the time the LDC application was made no such permission had been
   granted.”    Main
   Conclusions:    
·      
      No conclusions (because specific
      to this particular property)    Links to the “Appeal
   Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):    
·      
      Appeal Decision
      Notice:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00216-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 
·      
      OS Map:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00216-OS-Map.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 
·      
      Existing
      Drawings:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00216-Existing-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 
·      
      Proposed
      Drawings:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00216-Proposed-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 
·      
      Photo:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00216-Photo.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
   
      Download documents and diagrams of
useful Permitted Development
information 
 
   |