Appeal Decision 19 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
August 2009 -
Code a00019
Summary of Case (appeal
allowed):
The property is a two-storey
mid-terrace property, with Church Road to the front and Railway Road to the rear, and the application was for a
rear dormer.
The key issue is whether the proposed rear dormer would be contrary to Class B, part B.1(b), which states that
“development is not permitted by Class B if … any part of the dwellinghouse would, as a result of the works, extend
beyond the plane of any existing roof slope which forms the principal elevation of the dwellinghouse and fronts a
highway”.
The Council argued that, for
this property, both the front roof slope and the rear roof slope constitute a principal
elevation. They pointed out that several publications from CLG
could support this argument, including the letter that was sent from CLG to Chief Planning Officers in
September 2008, which stated that “The order, therefore, simply specifies that a principal elevation fronts a
highway” (for more information about these documents, see the Council’s Appeal Statement, paragraphs
10-23).
The Inspector disagreed with the above arguments. He stated that the
use of the definite article in the phrase “the principal elevation” combined with the plain English definition of
the word “principal” must, in his view, mean that there can only be one elevation on a dwellinghouse to which the
Class B, part B.1(b) exception can apply. He stated that where there
is more than one elevation that could be judged to be the “principal” one, the wording of the GPDO requires a
decision to be made on the particular facts as to which one it is. He
concluded that in this particular case, the principal elevation is the one fronting Church Road.
Main
Conclusions:
·
Only one elevation can
constitute “the principal elevation”. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Principal Elevation”]. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
·
This appeal decision provides an
example of the types of factors that should be taken into consideration when determining which elevation is
“the principal elevation”. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
Links to the “Appeal Decision
Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
· Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00019-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Elevations: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00019-Elevations.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Councils Appeal Statement -
Part 1: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00019-Councils-Appeal-Statement-Part-1.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Councils Appeal Statement -
Part 2: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00019-Councils-Appeal-Statement-Part-2.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Extract from Householder
Development Consents Review: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00019-Extract-from-Householder-Development-Consents-Review.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information

|