Appeal Decision 163 - Certificate of Lawful
      Development.
    
        
            
                
                    This appeal decision summary and
                          assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited.  For more information, please go to  www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
                 
             | 
         
    
 
 
  
 
November 2010 - Code
   a00163 
  
Summary of Case (appeal
   dismissed):  
  
The property is a two-storey
   mid-terrace house with an original three-storey rear projection. The application was for an extension within the
   side infill area, which would have had length 6.2m matching the length of the infill area.  
  
The key issue was whether the
   proposals would be contrary to Class A, part A.1(e), which states that “development is not permitted by Class A
   if … the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse would … extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse by
   more than … 3 metres”.  
  
The Inspector stated the
   following:  
  
“In August 2010, the
   Government published Permitted Development for Householders: Technical Guidance as an aid to the interpretation
   of the Order. It clarifies on page 17 of the Guidance that, where the original rear wall of a house is stepped,
   then each of these walls will form ‘the rear wall of the original dwelling house’; this is illustrated in
   accompanying diagrams. It is clear that the proposed development would extend by more than 3m from one of the
   rear walls of the appeal dwelling house. It would not comply with the criteria which define permitted
   development in the Order and therefore I conclude that the Council’s decision to refuse the application for a
   Lawful Development Certificate is well founded”.  
  
Main
   Conclusions:  
  
·      
      Where a property has a
      (part-width) original rear projection, then there will be more than one wall that constitutes “the rear wall
      of the original dwellinghouse” for the purposes of Class A, part A.1(e). This means that where the original
      rear elevation of a property is stepped, the 3m/4m rear projection limit will be similarly
      stepped. [Note:
      This would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in
      the “Reference Section” on “The rear wall of the original dwellinghouse”]. [Relevant to: “The rear wall of the original
      dwellinghouse”, A.1(e), A.1(f), A.2(c)]. 
  
Links to the “Appeal Decision
   Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):  
  
·       Appeal Decision
   Notice: 
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00163-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
·       OS
      Map: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00163-OS-Map.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
·       Floor
   Plans: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00163-Floor-Plans.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
·      
   Elevations: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00163-Elevations.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
  
  
 
 
 
 
   
  
Download documents and diagrams of
useful 
Permitted Development
information 
  
 
  
 |