Appeal Decision 33 -
Certificate of Lawful Development.
The
following appeal summary has been written by Steve
Speed, and is available on his website
www.planningjungle.com
22
October 2009 – 541 Kenton Road,
Harrow, HA3 0UF
Planning
Inspectorate Reference:
APP/T5150/X/09/2096882
Inspector:
B.S.Rogers BA(Hons), DipTP, MRTPI
London
Borough of Brent Reference: 08/3198
Summary
of Case (appeal dismissed):
The
property is a two-storey semi-detached property, with rear
and side elevations that are flat (i.e. not
stepped). The
application was for a proposed extension that would have
projected from the rear elevation, and then
wrapped-around the corner to project from the
side elevation.
Most of the proposed extension would have been
single-storey, except for a part of the extension directly
to the rear of the property which would have been
two-storey.
The
Council’s reason for refusal was not particular detailed,
and simply stated that the proposed extension “… failed to
comply with the requirements for permitted development under
Schedule 2 Part 1, Classes A and B of the Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, as
amended …”.
However, the Council’s delegated report gives several
reasons why the proposed extension was considered to be
contrary to the amended Part 1, including that “The corner
element does not extend beyond the original dwellinghouse
and thus is considered unlawful”.
In the
appeal decision notice, the Inspector stated the
following:
“The
appellant agrees with the Council that the ground floor
element of the proposed extension is not permitted
development under Class A of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the Town
and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order
1995, as amended. That is because part of the extension
would not be attached to either the side or rear wall of the
original dwellinghouse”.
The
Inspector agreed with the above argument that the ground
floor part of the proposed extension would not be
permitted development. Furthermore, noting that
the first floor part of the proposed extension could not be
built in the absence of the ground floor part, the Inspector
concluded that the whole development would be
unlawful.
[Note: In my opinion, the above appeal decision is
questionable, because the Inspector has agreed that the
“corner” part of the proposed extension would not be permitted
development, without identifying any limitation or
condition to which this “corner” part would be
contrary. The fact
that the corner part “does not extend beyond the original
dwellinghouse” (as stated by the Council) or “would not be
attached to either the side or rear wall of the original
dwellinghouse” (as stated by the Inspector) does not, in
my opinion, mean that the corner part would be contrary to
Class A, part A.1(e) or Class A, part A.1(h), as neither
of these limitations state that all parts of an extension
must be attached to a wall. Instead, these limitations
simply mean that if an extension does extend from
such a wall, it must not extend by more than a certain
amount].
Main Conclusions:
·
Where the rear and side elevations of a property are flat (i.e.
not stepped), Class A, part A.1(e), and Class A, part A.1(h)
would not allow an extension to project 3m/4m from the
rear elevation and then wrap-around the corner to
project half the width of the house from the side
elevation.
[Note: This would appear to contradict at least one other
appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the
“Contents” section on “A.1(e)”]
[Note: In my opinion, the above appeal decision is
questionable, because the Inspector has agreed that the
“corner” part of the proposed extension would not be permitted
development, without identifying any limitation or
condition to which this “corner” part would be
contrary].
[Relevant
to: A.1(e), A.1(h)].
Link to
case on Planning Inspectorate website:
http://www.pcs.planningportal.gov.uk/pcsportal/ViewCase.asp?casename=APP/T5150/X/09/2096882&caseaddress=COO.2036.300.8.1188451
Link to
LPA website:
http://www.brent.gov.uk
Download
documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted
Development information

|