Appeal Decision 16 -
Certificate of Lawful Development.
The
following appeal summary has been written by Steve
Speed, and is available on his website
www.planningjungle.com
5 August 2009 – 11 Wrentham
Avenue, Kensal Rise, London NW10 3HT
Planning
Inspectorate Reference: APP/T5150/X/09/2102648
London
Borough of Brent Reference: 08/3051
Summary
of Case (appeal dismissed):
The
property is a two-storey mid-terrace house. Its front elevation is
staggered, such that it has three separate main front-facing
roof slopes, plus the roof over the front bay
window. The
application was for various works to the roof, and included the
sideways extension of the first and second main front-facing
roof slopes.
The key issue was whether the proposals would be contrary to
Class B, part B.1(b), which states that “development is not
permitted by Class B if … any part extends beyond the plane of
any existing roof slope which forms the principal elevation of
the dwellinghouse and fronts a highway”.
The Inspector concluded that all four of the front-facing
roof slopes form part of the principal
elevation.
He concluded that therefore the proposals would “extend a
roof slope considerably beyond another existing roof
slope in the front elevation”, contrary to Class B, part
B.1(b), and would not be permitted
development.
Main Conclusion:
·
Where the front elevation of a property is staggered, such that
it has more than one front-facing roof slope, then it is
possible for all of
these separate roof slopes to each form part of “the principal
elevation”.
·
In such a case, a roof extension that would extend beyond the
plane of any of these roof slopes would not be permitted
development.
Link to
case on Planning Inspectorate website:
http://www.pcs.planningportal.gov.uk/pcsportal/ViewCase.asp?casename=APP/T5150/X/09/2102648&caseaddress=COO.2036.300.8.1594816
Download
documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted
Development information

|