Appeal Decision 14 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
August 2009 -
Code a00014
Summary of Case (appeal
allowed):
The property is a two-storey
mid-terrace house. The application was for a single storey rear
extension, which would have had a mono-pitch roof, sloping up towards the main house. This would have had height 2.82m along its rear elevation, increasing to
height 3.78m where it meets the rear wall of the main house.
The Council refused the application on the basis that the height of the eaves of the proposed extension would
exceed 3m. The Inspector noted that from a checklist used to assess
permitted development, it would appear that the Council measured the height of the eaves as 3.78 metres.
The Inspector concluded that the height of the eaves of the proposed extension would not exceed
3m. As there is no definition of “eaves” in the Order, the
Inspector took the ordinary dictionary meaning as “the lower overhanging part of a sloping
roof”.
Main
Conclusions:
·
For an extension with a pitched
roof, the “eaves” of the extension are the lower end of the slope, and can not be taken to be the higher end
(i.e. ridge-line) of the slope. [Relevant to: “Eaves”, A.1(g), E.1(e)].
Links to the “Appeal Decision
Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
· Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00014-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· OS
Map: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00014-OS-Map.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Drawings: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00014-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information

|