Permitted Development England
                                                                                                                                             What you can build without Planning Permission Oct. 1st 2008

 

 

 

 Home Page  Contact Us  Privacy  About Us  FAQ  Disclaimer  Site Map

Appeal Decision 111 - Certificate of Lawful Development.


 

The following appeal summary has been written by Steve Speed, and is available on his website www.planningjungle.com


 

23 March 2010 – 45 Highfield Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2JJ  

Planning Inspectorate Reference: APP/L5240/X/09/2117689 

Inspector: A J Bingham TD Dipl Arch ARIBA MRTPI 

London Borough of Croydon Reference: 09/02619/LP 

 

 

Summary of Case (appeal allowed): 

 

 

 

The property is a two-storey detached house. This part of Highfield Road is curved, such that the north elevation of the property faces onto Highfield Road directly, whilst the east elevation of the property faces onto Highfield Road at an angle (see OS map at the end of the appeal decision notice). The application was for a proposed two-storey extension to the west elevation, the ground floor of which would project 4m from the west elevation and the first floor of which would project 3m. The roof of the two-storey extension would join onto the roof of the main house, with eaves at the same level and a ridge-line at a slightly lower level. 

 

The key issue was whether the proposed extension would be contrary to Class A, part A.1(d), which states that “Development is not permitted by Class A if … the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse would extend beyond a wall which— (i) fronts a highway, and (ii) forms either the principal elevation or a side elevation of the original 

Dwellinghouse”. 

 

In determining which elevation is “the principal elevation”, the Inspector noted a number of factors. On the east elevation, he noted the impression of grandeur given by the 2 x two-storey bay windows with a first floor veranda between them, and he noted that these windows provided the sole prospect and source of light for the lounge and dining room on the ground floor, and for the two bedrooms on the first floor. In contrast, on the north elevation, the Inspector noted that while it contains the main entrance, except for this door and a first floor bay window, the wall is largely blank. The Inspector concluded that the east elevation is “the principal elevation”, and stated the following: 

 

“Insofar as the proposed extension would abut the rear wall of the original house and would not project beyond an original side elevation the proposed extension would not infringe clause (h). I have also considered the proposed development against all the other clauses in paragraph A.1 of Class A but in my opinion it does not contravene any of them. Accordingly, I find the proposed extension to comprise permitted development countenanced by paragraph A of Class A of Part 1 of the schedule to the 2008 Order.” 

 

Although not specifically addressed by the Inspector, the fact that this appeal was allowed implies that Class A does permit an extension with a roof that would join onto the roof of the main house. It also implies that where it is proposed to erect a two-storey rear extension, Class A, part A.1(f) would restrict only the first floor to a depth of 3m. 

 

Main Conclusions: 

 

·       The principal elevation is not necessarily the elevation that contains the main entrance.
[Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b), E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].

 

·       Class A does permit an extension with a roof that would join onto the roof of the main house.
[Note: This would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Contents” section on “A.1(i)”].
[Relevant to: A.1(i)].

 

·       Where it is proposed to erect a two-storey rear extension, Class A, part A.1(f) would restrict only the first floor to a depth of 3m. It therefore is possible on a detached property to erect (as a single operation) a two-storey rear extension that has a ground floor with depth 4m and a first floor with depth 3m.
[Note: This would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Contents” section on “A.1(f)”].
[Relevant to: A.1(f)].

 

Link to case on Planning Inspectorate website: 

http://www.pcs.planningportal.gov.uk/pcsportal/ViewCase.asp?casename=APP/L5240/X/09/2117689&caseaddress=COO.2036.300.8.2810183 

 

Link to LPA website: 

www.croydon.gov.uk 

 

 

 




 

  

 

Download documents and diagrams of useful

Permitted Development information

permitted development documents download


Bookmark this page
Google BookmarksYahoo My WebFacebook

 How to use this web site
 Commercial permitted development PD explained
 Commercial PD part 8
 Commercial PD part 41
 Commercial PD part 42
 Certificate of Lawful Development Appeal List of Appeal Sites
 Principal elevation
 A side elevation of the original dwelling house
 Highest part of the roof
 Basements
 Development within the curtliage of a dwelling house
 Conditions
 Applications received prior to 01-1-2008 yet determined on or after 01-10-2008
 Applications received on or after 01-10-2008 for works that were begun prior to 01-10-2008
 General
 Class A development
 Class B development
 Class C development
 Class D development
 Class E development
 Class F development
 Class G development
 Class H development
 Incidental Use Appeal Decisions
 Use of a property
 Class A to H Permitted Development explained
 Article 4 Directions Removal of PD Rights
 Garden Buildings without Planning Permission
 History of Planning in the UK
 Detached garden buildings and enclosures under permitted development rules
 Micro generation permitted development
 Permitted development listed buildings
 Permitted Development Flats
 Permitted Development Demolition
 Permitted Development Agricultural Buildings
 Permitted Development Solar Panels
 Renewable Energy Permitted Development
 Permitted Development Consultation
 Permitted Development Conservation Areas
 Permitted Development Loft Conversions
 Permitted Development Extensions
 Permitted Development Legislation
 Householder Permitted Development
 Permitted Development Scotland
 Telecommunications Permitted Development
 Agricultural Permitted Development
 Permitted Development Limits
 Permitted Development Outbuildings
 What can stop permitted development
 Products
 Web Sites
 Services
 Council locator
 News
 What is comming in PD Legislation
 Government spin on the new Permitted Development
 Royal Town Planning Institutes opinion
 The Planning Service agricultural buildings
 Architecture and design Service
 Communities and Local Government
 Questions previously received
 Planning Application Fees
 PD Diagram Part 1 Classes A and D
 PD Diagram Part 1 Classes B and C
 PD Diagram Part 1 Class E
 PD Diagram Part 1 Class F
 PD Diagram Part 1 Class G
 PD Diagram Part 1 Class H
 Download Building Regulations Approved Documents
 Download The Party Wall Act Document
 Download the latest PD legal document
 Download the old PD legal document
 Download a farmers guide to the planning system
 Download a guide to permeable surfaces
 Download statutory instruments
 Download commercial permitted development rights