Appeal Decision 10A - Certificate of Lawful Development.
The following appeal
summary has been written by Steve Speed, and is available on his website www.planningjungle.com
24 July 2009 – Acre Barn Cottage, St Georges Hill Road, Redhill,
Surrey RH1 5RD
Planning Inspectorate
Reference: APP/L3625/X/08/2088922
Reigate & Banstead
Borough Council Reference: P/08/00641/CLP
Summary of Case
(appeal dismissed):
·
The application was for a single storey
outbuilding, which would have consisted of two bedrooms, two bathrooms, a lounge and a study. The appellant argued that the proposed outbuilding would be a “granny
annexe” for ancillary use
incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse, with no kitchen, and no separate garden.
The Inspector acknowledged that the
proposed building
would not have a kitchen and that the occupants could eat with the family in the main
dwellinghouse. However, he also noted that the simple introduction of small kitchen appliances
such as a microwave, fridge and oven would allow the building to be occupied entirely
independently. He concluded that the proposed building,
with two bedrooms, two bathrooms, study, lounge and hall, would be in excess of what would reasonably be
required for a purpose incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse, and would not therefore be permitted
development under Class E.
Main
Conclusion:
· Where a large outbuilding would have many of the
facilities that are typically found in a self-contained residential unit, then even though it might not have all
such facilities (in this case there would have been no kitchen), it is still possible for it to fail to comply with
the “incidental” requirement of Class E.
Link to case on Planning
Inspectorate website:
http://www.pcs.planningportal.gov.uk/pcsportal/ViewCase.asp?casename=APP/L3625/X/08/2088922&caseaddress=COO.2036.300.8.595703
|