Certificate of Lawful
Development Appeal Decisions by category of
development.
The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted
Development) Order 1995
Part 1 (as amended on 1 October
2008)
The
following appeal summary has been written by Steve
Speed, and is available on his website
www.planningjungle.com
A side elevation of the original dwelling
house
·
The side wall of an original rear projection (i.e. the side
wall facing the infill area) is “a side elevation of the
original dwellinghouse” for the purposes of the
GPDO.
[Note: This contradicts several entries below].
[Source: 8
May 2009 – 27 Upper Culver Road].
[Source: 2 December 2009 – 84 Frances Road].
[Source: 8 December 2009 – 17 Carden Road]. [Source: 25
January 2010 – 22 Hillway]. [Source: 15 February 2010
– 3 Dungarvan Avenue].
[Source: 15 April 2010
– Field Bank Farm, Withinlee Road].
[Source: 1 June 2010 – 25 Blenheim Grove].
·
For example, an extension to the side of an original rear
projection within a
conservation area is not permitted
development.
[Note: This contradicts several entries below].
[Source: 8
May 2009 – 27 Upper Culver Road].
[Source: 2 December 2009 – 84 Frances Road].
[Source: 8 December 2009 – 17 Carden Road]. [Source: 25
January 2010 – 22 Hillway]. [Source: 1 June 2010 – 25 Blenheim
Grove].
·
For example, an extension to the side of an original rear
projection where the
extension has a width greater than half the width of
the original house is not permitted
development.
[Note: This contradicts several entries below].
[Source:
15 February 2010 – 3 Dungarvan Avenue].
·
For example, an extension to the side of an original rear
projection where the
extension exceeds 4m in height is
not permitted
development.
[Note: This contradicts several entries below].
[Source:
15 April 2010 – Field
Bank Farm, Withinlee Road].
·
For example, an extension to the side of an original rear
projection where the
extension has more than one storey is
not permitted
development.
[Note: This contradicts several entries below].
[Source:
15 April 2010 – Field
Bank Farm, Withinlee Road].
·
Furthermore, even the side wall of an original single
storey rear projection (i.e. the side wall facing the
infill area) is “a
side elevation of the original dwellinghouse” for the purposes
of the GPDO.
[Note: This contradicts several entries below].
[Source: 2
December 2009 – 84 Frances Road].
[Source: 1 June 2010 –
25 Blenheim Grove].
·
The side wall of an original rear projection (i.e. the side
wall facing the infill area) is not “a side elevation of the
original dwellinghouse” for the purposes of the
GPDO.
[Note: This contradicts several entries above].
[Source: 4
March 2010 – 6 Carlton Bank].
·
For example, an extension to the side of an original rear
projection within a
conservation area is permitted
development.
[Note: This contradicts several entries above].
[Source: 4
March 2010 – 6 Carlton Bank].
·
A property can have more than one wall that constitutes
“a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse” for the
purposes of the GPDO. [Source: 8
December 2009 – 17 Carden Road].
[Source: 15 April 2010
– Field Bank Farm, Withinlee Road].
·
The phrase “a wall forming a side elevation of the original
dwellinghouse” does not apply to an original side wall
that has previously been demolished. [Source:
25 January 2010 – 45 Lynwood Road].
[Source: 5 February 2010 – 32 Montana Road].
Download
documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted
Development information

|